UI'05/WCU Conference Proceedings : Manuscript Review Form


Title of the Manuscript:
. . Manuscript Number: . . Date Received:
Author(s):

Please select the name of the Ultrasonics Guest Editor overseeing the review of this manuscript:

T Biwa/Thermoacoustics
M Deschamps/Surface Waves
Nico F Declercq/Acousto-Optics
A G Every/... Anisotropic Media
M S Greenwood/Process Monitor and Control
M S Greenwood/Ultrasound and Particles
V Gusev/Nonlinear Ultrasonics of Cracks...
S Hirsekorn/Other Non-linear Ultrasonics...
P Lewin/ * Papers in Bio-medical Ultrasound *
B Linde/Physical Acoustics

T Mason/Sonochemistry
P Nagy/Industrial Appls of NDT
A Neild/Ultrasound and Particles
M Qian; J Cantrell/Bond Strength
Y Nakagawa/Piezo Matls/Devices; Trans Modeling; Trans Technology
J E Wilhjelm/Vascular Ultrasound; Plaque
W Sachse/ * Ultrasonics Sessions *
N Sugimoto/Nonl Acoustic Phenomena in Resonators...
G ter Haar/Therapeutic Ultrasound
S Ueha/Industrial Applications
J Vollmann/ ... Laser Ultrasonics
.

Please enter your name:
and your E-mail address:

To complete this form, simply "click" on the appropriate box and type-in your remarks/evaluation. (Cursor, delete keys, etc. are operative. The boxes expand to accept everything you enter.)


Review of Manuscript Contents:

  1. Does the manuscript contain sufficient new, original and significant material to warrant publication in the UI'05/WCU Conference Proceedings ?

  2. Are the background materials and results properly presented?

  3. Please specify any doubtful or controversial arguments.
    Are there any errors in logic or mathematical analysis.

Review of Manuscript Format:

  1. Is the manuscript written concisely and in good English?
    If not, please indicate suggested revisions.

  2. Should the manuscript be reduced in length?
    Invited Paper: 12 typewritten pages (MAXIMUM); Contributed Paper: 8 pages (MAXIMUM)
    If so, please suggest possible cuts.

  3. Are the References reasonably complete?
    If not, please indicate suggested additions/deletions.

  4. Are the figures and tables as well as their captions clear?
    If not, please indicate suggested revisions.

  5. Any other comments on this manuscript that should be conveyed to the author(s)?

Recommended Disposition of the Manuscript:

  1. The manuscript should be accepted for publication in its present form.
  2. The manuscript should be rejected.
  3. The manuscript should be returned to the author(s) for revisions. After changes have been made by the author(s), the manuscript should be accept ed without further review by you.
  4. After changes have been made by the author(s), the manuscript should be returned to you for evaluation and proper disposition of the manuscript.
  5. The manuscript should be reviewed by an additional or another reviewer.
    Suggested reviewer (please supply address, if possible):


The authors, readers and editors of the journal Ultrasonics are grateful to you for your careful and critical review and evaluation of this conference manuscript. We appreciate the time you have taken from your schedule to do this task. Thank you!
Would you like to be sent a confirmation copy of your review? Yes . . . Not necessary

Action :



Go to the Home Page of the journal ULTRASONICS / ultras@cornell.edu
Version: September 5, 2005; Updated: December 15, 2005